Have Opposition MPs misunderstood the nature of lobbying as well as its legal status?
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Debate: BJP's Walmart attack
The issue of Wal-Mart lobbying on Monday (December 10) led to a political storm with Opposition creating pandemonium in the Rajya Sabha and promising to create further trouble tomorrow by pressing its demand for a probe and a statement by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. In a debate moderated by TIMES NOW's Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami, panelists -- Renuka Chaudhary, Natl. Spokesperson & MP, Rajya Sabha Congress; Swaminathan Aiyar, Consulting Editor, Economic Times; Venkaiah Naidu, Senior leader & MP, Rajya Sabha, BJP; Derek O Brien, Chief Whip & MP, TMC; Rajiv Desai, Chairman & CEO, Comma Consulting debate the issue.
Monday, December 17, 2012
Advocacy of interest or corporate bribery?
"...to secure the public interest, it is vital that the government shine a light on the power brokerages and influences peddlers in Delhi and other states."
Though
the BJP's noisemakers may not appreciate it, through their hysterical outbursts
against Wal-Mart, they may have unwittingly sponsored a major reform in pursuit
of good governance. In its misbegotten campaign against the American firm, the
BJP threatened to disrupt Parliament again, as it has done repeatedly for the
past nine years. This prompted Parliamentary Affairs minister Kamal Nath to
agree to a public inquiry into the company’s lobbying activities in India . Though a
spectacularly ignorant BJP spokesman suggested that the minister’s assent to an
inquiry proved their point, the truth is that the UPA’s quick response saved
the day and it appears that much overdue legislation will now be enacted.
The
BJP’s empty-vessel strategy to corner the government on lobbying by Wal-Mart
boomeranged in Parliament because of Mr Nath’s finesse. Reports say the
government will appoint a retired judge to conduct the inquiry. Most likely,
the exercise will stretch out and will hold no more sensation value; the BJP will
find some other dubious platform from which to rant against the UPA government.
As such, the inquiry will join the long list of commissions that have provided
not much more than sinecures for superannuated law officers.
On
the other hand, the government could actually use the inquiry to clean up the
murk that surrounds lobbying in India .
To secure the public interest, it is vital that the government shine a light on
power brokerages and influence peddlers in Delhi and in the various states.
A
thoughtful judge at the helm of the inquiry might recommend the establishment
of a Parliamentary registry that provides credentials to lobbyists, individual
as well as firms. In accepting such credentials, lobbyists would be required to
disclose their clients and fees received. The registry could go a step further
and demand from various government ministries, departments and agencies
periodic reports on any contacts they may have had with lobbyists.
Recommendations
of this nature could bring much needed transparency to the conduct of public
affairs; you won’t have a BJP president Bangaru Laxman accepting bribes or a
DMK minister A Raja playing fast and loose with the allocation of telecom
spectrum. A whole horde of middlemen, the kind you see at power lunches in The
Taj or cocktail parties at The Oberoi, will stand exposed. The business of
lobbying could become professional and cleansed of the stain of corruption.
Lobbying
is a time-honored practice that dates at least as far back as the signing of
the Magna Carta in 13th-century England, from whence sprang the right of
association and the right to petition authority, the cornerstones of the
lobbying profession.
Closer
to home and to the age, lobbying has had many beneficial outcomes. These
include campaigns for universal primary education, against sex trafficking, to
lower taxes on toiletries and cosmetics, to amend laws governing the business
of financial services, courier firms and cable operators, among others. They
have been successful and have benefited the public interest as much as the
interests of those who sponsored them.
This article appeared in Hindustan Times on December 16, 2012.
Friday, December 14, 2012
Andy capped - How to outsmart the smartest of smartphones
Bunny
recently outsmarted a smartphone. We’d heard of smartphones. Like we’d
heard of flying saucers, and of the giant Hadron collider which
scientists have been using to discover whether the Higgs-Boson god
particle actually exists. But, as in the case of flying saucers and the
giant Hadron collider, we’d never actually met a smartphone. Not until
our friend Rajiv got himself one.
Something or the other, to
which no one present seems to know the answer, crops up in conversation.
Like who won the last but one assembly by-election in the
Phalana-Dhimka district of Gujarat. Or whether it was Mukesh or Mohammed
Rafi who did the voice-over for the hero in the Dilip Kumar-starrer
Naya Daur. Or what the mean temperature in Vladivostok is during the
winter solstice.
And before you know it, Rajiv has whipped out
his smartphone, performed some tantric jantar-mantar with it, and come
up with the answer to whatever the question was: the winner of the
Phalana-Dhimka by-election, the playback singer for Naya Daur, the mean
winter solstice Vladivostok temperature. In Celsius, as well as
Fahrenheit. So there.
It’s spooky. It’s the electronic age
equivalent of a magical brass lamp with an inbuilt know-it-all genie at
your command. And Rajiv is not the only person we know who’s got his own rent-agenie in the form of a smartphone. A number of our other friends have got them as well.
The
result is that what is called peer pressure – also known as keeping up
with the Joneses, though of course in India it wouldn’t be the Joneses,
but the Suris, or the Mathurs, or some such – began to build up on Bunny
to join the smartphone set. Being so technologically challenged that
for a long time i imagined the keyboard formulation called QWERTY to be
an umbrella organisation for LGBT fraternities, i was automatically
excluded from any such pressure. My getting a smartphone would be like
Manmohan Singh being given a gift voucher for Elocution Lessons on
Public Speaking. Gee, thanks. But what the heck am i supposed to do with
the darn thing?
So Bunny dutifully began to bone up on
smartphones. She found out that the name of the genie inside smartphones
was Android, Andy to friends. And Andy had something called apps, which
are to Andy what abs are to John Abraham, a sort of existential
defining trait: i apps, therefore i am.
Thanks to its apps, your personalized Andy could play you music, show you a film, tell you what
time it was on the planet Mars, and teach you Gangnam style horse dancing
in Seven Easy Steps. All this for about 30,000 bucks, plus or minus
change.
Then Bunny asked herself a question: did she really want
– for 30,000 bucks, plus or minus change – something that would every
day, in every way show her how much smarter it was than her? How smart –
or how dumb – was that? That’s when Bunny outsmarted the smartest
smartphone ever invented. By deciding not to buy a smartphone.
This article by Jug Suraiya appeared in Times of India on December 14, 2012.
Labels:
android,
apps,
bunny,
gangnam,
genie,
higgs-boson,
john abraham,
manmohan singh,
mohammed rafi,
naya daur,
pranabda,
qwerty,
rajiv,
Sheila Dikshit,
smartphone,
viswanathan anand
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)